掲示板 Forums - grammar troubles
Top > 日本語を勉強しましょう / Let's study Japanese! > Anything About Japanese Getting the posts
Top > 日本語を勉強しましょう / Let's study Japanese! > Anything About Japanese
so my grammar score is really low, and i have a hard time actually doing the quizzes. i’m not sure why but i think i have a hunch it’s because i don’t know all of the phrases that are being mentioned, and even with translations it helps but it just feel frustrating.
and when stringing together sentences i have no trouble when i know the words きみの神じゃない(でしょう)translates to “buddy, your not a god (right?)” casual
but any other sentence and its just kaput, does anybody have any tips for this or do i just need more study
Grammar is an order of magnitude more complicated than the rest, like vocabulary. Not only do you have to remember the grammar words, but also all the rules. And you need to actually understand the sentence meaning and structure, not just individual words. It's like the difference between doing algebra and just memorizing multiplication tables.
So you have to take it slow, until you really "get it." If you go too fast, you'll just be overwhelmed. That's what the low score is telling you. You can set the schedule to review mode until you get consistently better. Then you can start learning new stuff again.
I also suggest cutting down the quiz size from the default 40. Grammar takes a lot more brain power so it gets tiring fast.
Btw, ideally, you should not memorize the phrases themselves. If you just do that, you won't really learn the grammar. You should understand why a particular grammar is used. If you get it wrong and you're not sure why, look at the comments. Most likely someone else had the same issue and it's been explained.
That’s a great point above about grammar, but I’d like to offer a slightly different perspective about "you should not memorize the phrases themselves".
Personally, I believe that you should memorize the phrase if you can because this is actually the best way to learn language. (this is how it works). Yep. Pretty illogical but...
Just think about how we use our native tongues. For example, I’m a native Russian speaker, but I honestly couldn't explain how the grammar rules work. I just rely on deeply ingrained patterns that I understand perfectly because I've used them as whole chunks my entire life.
(ofc. I was at school and leart it and ofc. I forgot almost all explanations)
I believe language learning naturally happens in two stages: you can learn the rules, but also you can learn the patterns (phrases) so deeply that you stop overthinking about conjugations or structures. You just start to feel the language.
So my main point is: there is many ways how we can learn language. Through the grammar or whole phrases. (or both)
If you can memorize the whole phrase - do it. If not - try to understand the rule and build it by your own way until you don't memorize it _)
and when stringing together sentences i have no trouble when i know the words きみの神じゃない(でしょう)translates to “buddy, your not a god (right?)” casual
Not quite. きみ + の + 神 doesn't mean "your not a god" (you're*)
きみ の 神 じゃない = "I'm not your god" / "[someone/something] is not your god", depending on the omitted subject.
きみ は 神 じゃない = "You're not a god"
[ でしょう doesn't change that core meaning ]
Note: Don't think of きみ as "buddy, pal", it's way more nuanced than that, and wouldn't make sense as a translation half the time. They carry English connotations that きみ doesn't inherently have. A lot of the time it's just "you", and this is definitely one of those cases :)
[ purely talking about the translation. The nuance is its own thing, and depends heavily on context ]
Anyway, I think you just need more practice. You *can* pick up a lot of grammar through exposure, but it's a painfully slow process. We're talking decades. I'd recommend a mix of immersion and structured study. The latter being way more impactful for a beginner.
That’s a great point above about grammar, but I’d like to offer a slightly different perspective about "you should not memorize the phrases themselves".
Personally, I believe that you should memorize the phrase if you can because this is actually the best way to learn language. (this is how it works). Yep. Pretty illogical but...
Just think about how we use our native tongues. For example, I’m a native Russian speaker, but I honestly couldn't explain how the grammar rules work. I just rely on deeply ingrained patterns that I understand perfectly because I've used them as whole chunks my entire life.
(ofc. I was at school and leart it and ofc. I forgot almost all explanations)
I believe language learning naturally happens in two stages: you can learn the rules, but also you can learn the patterns (phrases) so deeply that you stop overthinking about conjugations or structures. You just start to feel the language.
So my main point is: there is many ways how we can learn language. Through the grammar or whole phrases. (or both)
If you can memorize the whole phrase - do it. If not - try to understand the rule and build it by your own way until you don't memorize it _)
Gave you a Kao supporter point because yeah.
And no, it's not illogical. Most modern pedagogical research revolve around that idea. Although, there are complex details that nuance it, they don't change the basic idea. And renshuu design is partially based on that (ie: memorize pattern). You could even say that renshuu don't teach you "grammar". It teach you "grammar pattern" (which should be mainly memorized rather than perfectly understood at the beginning). It's a "learning style". If you want "pure" grammar, traditionnal textbook are better.
Anyway, since I usually can't simplify those kind of things (and end up talking too much about things I shouldn't talk about here), I wanted to give you a Kao supporter point 
PS: Which doesn't mean that what ヒヨドリ is wrong. But it's just a different learning style. For "pure grammar", renshuu is not the best (JLPT learning ressources too in general).
The way I read sentences, I'd break down their structure to see what to interpret.
That sentence is fundamentally what a Japanese sentence is structured. One of the ways I'd split them is as followed:
君(きみ)の 神じゃない でしょう。
I'm no linguist, but that is a way that linguists will split up sentences to make certain points, which makes it easier for analysis to highlight the parts and show how words interact. It's worth looking into that once in a while to see how this plays out.
Without reading/knowing the word but recognizing grammatical patterns, this merely is reduced to:
[Word 1]の [word 2]+negative [sentence ending(s)]
Taking out the words loses some meaning, but not the structure of what it's trying to say.
The の particle supports a relationship between word 1 and word 2. Like other particles, arranging it that way reminds me which word that particle belongs. The particle's friend. Buddy. Pal. の is a particle marking a possessive nature, which means that it also needs another friend. Buddy. Pal. So, it would be hard to move it in a different way without following the word it is meant to describe.
Word 2 also has a negative word attached to it. This isn't part of the の particle itself nor word 1. It wraps around word 2. This part applies a negative tense to that word.
The sentence ending じゃない, is just a sentence ending. It actually is something else, but that is too long of a story to cover. It's just plainly the plain meaning of saying that word 2 is not that.
As an aside, if it actually ended with です in place of でしょう, this functionally adds politeness encompassing the sentence. Otherwise, it doesn't really change the plain meaning. でしょう is just another form of です with its own meaning which establishes that particular intention of the statement.
When you're able to see the structure that aay, look up the meanings of the words, then try to fit the script dictated by how the grammar works. That would tell you what it is trying to say.