掲示板 Forums - Really confused with these sentences how they change with をplacement.
Top > 日本語を勉強しましょう / Let's study Japanese! > Anything About Japanese Getting the posts
Top > 日本語を勉強しましょう / Let's study Japanese! > Anything About Japanese
ive never really understood the idea of "direct objects" even though I'm fluent in English, so this is a bit confusing to me, I know that ga is like the subject which in the first is "I" and the second its an apple. But now my confusion is like why did the order have to change? And how do I just know that the second is saying the apple eats me if I didn't have the translation there to compare? It's a bit confusing. Why couldn't ringo ga be the start of the 2nd sentence?
The direct object in a sentence is what the verb is acting on. In English, its usually after the verb. In japanese it's marked with 'wo'. As for the order, japanese is much more flexible than English. So the example sentence reversing the ga and wo didn't change the meaning.
Watashi ga ringo wo taberu
Ringo ga watashi wo taberu
you could do it like that as well.
@Chirushii The meaning does change in that case. 私を食べる and リンゴを食べる don't mean the same thing at all.
That's why I don't like these "an apple eats ME" examples some resources like to give :D
They aren't wrong, but may cause a bit of confusion.
Something that might make the idea of a direct object clearer is to look at verbs that can't have one, namely intransitives.
Put simply, the subject does the action and the direct object is acted upon (unlike other objects, which can be what the action is carried out through , or for, or which show how exactly it's carried out etc.). That poor apple, realistically, can only be the object, the one being eaten. If it was the subject, the one who did the eating, now that would be scary.
But some verbs are intransitive, they don't act on something, they just happen. "I told a joke and he laughed." What did I tell? A joke. That's the direct object. But what did he laugh? Huh? What do you mean, what? He just laughed. He couldn't have laughed a wall, or a bird, or a conference. (He could have laughed at them, sure, but those are not direct objects, their relation to the verb is not that close.)
Now for Japanese:
If we're playing hide-and-seek, it matters if I (subject) see you (object), so I win, or you (subject) see me (object), so you win. In English, the subject will come before the verb and the direct object will come after. There's no need for particles, their place shows us their role. Japanese is more flexible as to where parts of the sentence can sit, so it needs particles (placed after the part) to show us what role they have. If I (私) see you (君), there will be a が after 私 to show I'm the one doing the seeing, and a を after 君 to show you're the one being seen. Because their position and order alone won't reliably tell us that.
Does it make a little more sense? You could also just try reading more sentences with を (including from Renshuu's dictionary's Sentences tab) to get a grip on how they work.
"Why couldn't ringo ga be the start of the 2nd sentence?"
It can :D
The point of those two examples was to demonstrate that the order of words doesn't matter as long as the particle are there.
私がりんごを食べる
りんごを私が食べる
私をりんごが食べる
りんごが私を食べる
The first two sentences carry the same information: 私=subject, りんご=object, 食べる=verb.
And the last two also carry the same information: 私=object, りんご=subject, 食べる=verb.
You worry about word order, Japaneses don't. At least grammaticaly. Focus on locating the particles for now because that's the important part and get used to that "flexibility". Otherwise, you will lose your mind with casual/spoken Japanese (and a lot of other thing).
Word order is interesting but only at higher level (past intermediate level imo).
PS: "ive never really understood the idea of "direct objects"", me too, that's why I completely ignored it to learn Japanese first :D. Instead, I focused on getting used to the sentences without trying to really understand them. You don't to "understand" the role of an object right now in order to "know" that "私がりんごを食べる" is a correct sentence whose meaning is "I eat an apple". And only after accumulating that kind of sentences was I able to talk about it a bit more. Only a tiny bit. But I also have more unresolved questions than before...
Anyway, if it doesn't make sense, just study more sentences until you get "used" to them. And later, come back to analyze them again with grammar. It's a lot easier to understand grammar once you're already "used" to the language (and know what is "correct" before trying to judge or understand it). But that's just my tips :D
Some like to start with grammar, other don't, both make tons of mistakes until their reach higher level and both may succeed too.
@Shamugan You have a slight typo in your third sentence: "私がを"
Just letting you know :)
Thanks xD
Also changed a few things that were slightly different from what I wanted to say x)
I think what can confuse English speakers is that Japanese particles "fuse" to what came before, while in English a particle links to the word after.
For example: I'm going to-->Tokyo vs. 東京<--に 行く.
In Japanese a particle changes the grammatical function of what it attaches to. In OP's example, りんご goes from being just a noun to りんごを which is an object that a verb can act on. And 私 goes from a simple pronoun to a subject 私が that can do the action.
I think it's useful to analyze a sentence not by words, like this:
私 ... が ... りんご ... を ... 食べる (just a jumble of words)
but rather like this:
私が ... りんごを ... 食べる (now it makes grammatical sense)
That way it's much more obvious who is the subject and object and how swapping をand が changes the meaning. As things become more complicated with modifiers and such, keeping this way of analyzing will help things make sense.
In Japanese, that's called a 文節 and it's the fundamental unit of Japanese grammar.
私が, りんごを and 食べる, each of them of them are a 文節.
Other fun fact, particles are almost never studied alone. They also belong to the 付属語 category. Basically, the "dependent word category".
The JP definition of 文節 is: 文を、実際の言語として不自然でない程度に区切ったときに得られる最小の単位. There are a few variations but basically, it's "The smallest unit obtained when a sentence is divided into parts that remain natural". Which I often want to translate to "The smallest unit that still makes sense" but that would be just me ranting about the way Japanese is taught x)
If you still have a hard time understanding it after all the answers above, I suggest watching CureDolly’s video about this. (I cannot do YouTube right now so I cannot link it for you)
I think I heard "Stop thinking about Japanese in an English perspecive"... or something along those lines from her videos.
I read some of her blogs as well which is a good food for thought about creating your Japanese mindset.
It is a great loss that she is not with us anymore.